Thoryn a écrit :Faut voir le bon côté des choses, ils ne peuvent que s'améliorer
![Content :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Tu vas être déçu en lisant la réponse du modo quand le problème est évoqué sur
google +.
Première réponse.
from a design concept the adventures to date are supposed to leave a lot to the GM to fill in and customize so that they can drop into any setting and any style of the game with any 'shadow' having fallen over the world.
if used only as written I can see why they would seem to lack good twists as some of that is left to you to create so that they fit into your world better.
I agree that some adventures are better than others, and some dont do much for me personally, however I do think that they all do as intended.
The fact that you like DDiLH the best tells me you are looking for more details and less that you have to fill in on your own, and that is fine - its just not what the current design directive is. If Rob sees that there is a huge demand for more detailed adventures I would expect to see more of them, as he tries to do what the people want as best as possible.
Les gens du sujet insistent sur la mauvaise écriture.
I do see, and understand, where you guys are coming from. I am just re-iterating the design intent (GM to 'fill in the blanks'). As said above, if more detail is what the people want, the newer adventures will reflect that desire, but it takes time. The 1st adventure with more detail is still really new, and other projects are on the table ahead of the next one.
Best thing people can do if they want more detailed adventures is keep this thread civil and intellectual, and buy a copy of Dark deeds in Last Hope. Seriously - if that adventure is more the style people want then it has to show in sales. A good discussion between ten of us in here does not always represent the thousands of fans out there... but what is actually purchased does. If DDiLH is selling great it will push Rob to do another. If DDiLH sits and gets dusty it will be a hard decision to do another like it.
J'avais déjà évoqué ces propos il y a quelques pages. Il est dit qu'ils vont fournir des scénarios avec plus de détail les prochaines fois. J'espère que c'est une manière diplomatique pour eux d'admettre la faiblesse des précédents.
Dernière modification par
Matam42 le jeu. août 18, 2016 11:34 am, modifié 1 fois.